It seems humans have reached a new level of
development. They train dogs to have sex and then film the acts. Is it
blamable? Are the little animals really harmed by this or are the people too
eager to find contempt?
Diane Sue Whalen, 54, of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, has
found a new funny sex activity. Together with Donald Roy Seigfried,
55, they trained two dogs to have sex with women. A mixed breed and a Labrador
were filmed while performing sex acts with Whalen.
Whalen’s son discovered the great number of 150
tapes which show his mother with the two dogs. Seigfried was accused to have filming all
the tapes and the dogs were taken away to a shelter.
Best Friends Animal Shelter in Utah received the two
dogs after they were placed in the Tulsa Animal Shelter. They will be taken to
a no-kill sanctuary next month. Both Whalen and Seigfried were charged with felony crimes
against nature.
Whalen was ready to give up her dogs, but Seigfried
wanted to keep Merlin, a third blue heeler dog used in some videos.
Lucky and Buddy, the two dogs, were examined at
Tulsa veterinary clinic after the arrest. At Best Friends Animal Shelter, the
two dogs will be handed for adoption. Even if a deputy who investigated the
case said that it would be better to kill the dogs, as they were trained to
rape, the animal shelter refused saying that the dogs are “totally victims.”
From years of study in Criminal Justice and observations, cops are the real people we (the public) should fear. They are psychotics with personal control issues and they investigate their own wrong doing and are always found to have acted 'justifiably'.
With regard to the dogs... only a extremely sick bastard could conclude that the dogs in question should be killed because they are trained to rape. I suppose that they are going to force some woman to take her clothes off... the only way such a 'crime' could ever occur. COps are assholes and should be avoided at whenever possible.
My guess is that the tapes were made to sell to the porn industry. 150 tapes seems excess solely for their own "kicks." This is a crime of greed, and when greed focuses on money, both sick and evil are relevant!
Well that's certainly someone who has some major sexual issues and should REALLY get some help, but how exactly is this a crime? I mean, I doubt that the dog was really having that hard a time with having sex. Adult dogs are totally sexual creatures who are able to give consent to having sex.
I mean, besides making most everyone else who hears about it feel icky, who exactly is hurt by this? How making this a criminal matter actually helping anyone?
It's not like dogs are afraid of sex or anything. I've had enough dogs attempt to make unwanted advances toward my leg to know that.
I sometimes wonder if the human race can sink any lower ... How anyone could ever find something like that to be "funny" or "amusing" is beyond me. What was the actual charge they received for felony against nature (in dollars, jail time?) Usually cruelty to animal fines are practically a slap on the wrist. Those poor animals. I hope they'll eventually be adopted by someone who really cares about them and treats them with the respect they deserve.
oh dear - a deputy who doesn't know what he's talking about
First of all, I don't think it really matters if they are evil or sick. The fact is that most people which either psychological disorders or deviant tendencies are more often than not untreatable. This is why we see so many people who are repeat offenders in sexual crimes, whether it be against women or children or... animals I guess.
I'm all for being politically correct, but if a dog attacks a human we immediately put it down, even without knowing why it did what it did. Why should humans be held to a higher standard when their crimes are even more animal in nature than that?
I think that we have come to a point in our society where we believe that preserving our species is, somehow, more important than recognizing when something is not right. Is capital punishment the right way to go for thse offenders? Possibly.
Heck, why not? I'm just so sick of people justifying cruelty to other people, animals, or things as being a "sickness" and hoping they will get better, or using words like "they'll go to hell for this" as some means of making us feel better. Meanwhile it's those same preachers of heaven and hell who will be, ultimately, waiting for us in this so-called afterlife to sodomize us once again, but only if we die young I guess.
Sickness is usually something over which we don't have much control. What is happening here is not sickness - it is an evil depraved deliberate choice. But then there are so many of them in these days.
First of all, I don't think it really matters if they are evil or sick. The fact is that most people which either psychological disorders or deviant tendencies are more often than not untreatable. This is why we see so many people who are repeat offenders in sexual crimes, whether it be against women or children or... animals I guess.
I'm all for being politically correct, but if a dog attacks a human we immediately put it down, even without knowing why it did what it did. Why should humans be held to a higher standard when their crimes are even more animal in nature than that?
I think that we have come to a point in our society where we believe that preserving our species is, somehow, more important than recognizing when something is not right. Is capital punishment the right way to go for thse offenders? Possibly.
Heck, why not? I'm just so sick of people justifying cruelty to other people, animals, or things as being a "sickness" and hoping they will get better, or using words like "they'll go to hell for this" as some means of making us feel better. Meanwhile it's those same preachers of heaven and hell who will be, ultimately, waiting for us in this so-called afterlife to sodomize us once again, but only if we die young I guess.
Childhood Infections Need to be Better Tracked
The federal officials have asked doctors and state health agencies to be more careful when they diagnose children because many of the kids aged under 5 can now be...
