Hospital Staff Sacked for Snooping Spears’ Medical Records
Hospital Staff Sacked for Snooping Spears’ Medical Records
The UCLA Medical Center, that had the 26-year-old Britney Spears under observation for two times in January, was forced to fire some of its employees and to discipline others. After several investigations were made, it was discovered that the staff have snooped at the confidential medical records of the troubled singer. As a result, more than 13 employees, none of whom doctors, were fired and twelve others, including some doctors will be disciplined for looking at the pop star’s computerized records.

According to the Associated Press, Jeri Simpson, the hospital’s director of human resources did not reveal the real number of employees fired, neither when the snooping took place, but he confirmed that a part of the hospital’s staff was sacked. Simpson told the AP that the situation is “not only surprising, it’s very frustrating and it’s very disappointing.”

Moreover, according to The Los Angeles Times, no evidence that any employee sold the information about the pop singer was found. However, the staff’s action is a violation of state and federal medical privacy law, due to the fact that under federal law only doctors and medical staff directly involved with a patient are able to work with records. 

Unfortunately, this is not the first time for the hospital to face this situation. In September 2005, when Spears’ first son, Sean Preston, was born several employees were caught peeking in the singer’s files and were fired.

Britney Spears was first hospitalized at the UCLA Medical Center in early January after facing a crisis when Kevin Federline’s representatives tried to retrieve their two children. The second hospitalization occurred only a few weeks later after police called to her house.




© 2007 - 2008 - eNews 2.0 All Rights Reserved
 
 
 
 
Childhood Infections Need to be Better TrackedChildhood Infections Need to be Better Tracked
The federal officials have asked doctors and state health agencies to be more careful when they diagnose children because many of the kids aged under 5 can now be...

Childhood Infections Need to be Better Tracked
 

dotclear
dotclear